Main criteria in land use allocation for Baguio City

Slope is one of the most important land characteristics being considered in land use suitability evaluation. Slope controls the direction and often the quantity of surface drainage (or runoff) and influences soil erosion susceptibility and rainfall infiltration into the soil. It also determines the ultimate use of the land.

Baguio City is 4,500 meters above sea level. Against the land suitability criteria (i.e. 50% and above slope and mean elevation of 1,000 meters above sea level), this means the City is a protection area. (Which is why I don’t understand why continued rapid development is allowed to eat up this City’s space – I’m wondering about what sea decision-makers have as their reference point in measuring the City’s steepness. Is there a sea around the Cordilleras I don’t see?)

Source: http://www.flickriver.com/photos/tags/mountainprovince/interesting/

In addition, the City is within a multiple hazard zone: natural (earthquake, landslide/erosion, climate-related given its altitude), and manmade (increased flooding/water runoff due to questionable development on watersheds and forest areas).

Given these, my personal bias is that the whole of Baguio City meets the criteria of and so should be placed under NIPAS, specifically as a protected and managed landscape, to serve as moratorium on further unplanned development (so much in terms of the City’s urban form is unplanned) until such time that City Hall will produce and finance the plan.

Meanwhile, since the land has already been built on and quite extensively, with more built up areas now than forest protection areas, the only alternative is to make the present land use work.

Still, land use of the City should be maintained (rehabilitated is more like it given current situation) as a predominantly protection area, or the percentage of forest use should be equal or greater than that for built up areas. Otherwise, what’s the slope criteria for?

In this light, the BLISTT metropolitan arrangement should be a win-win strategy for the towns and municipalities involved including Baguio City. If adopted, allocation and development of land for built up areas will be shared (i.e. at the level of the metropolitan) so that no one single town or city has to give up too much or all of its forest space.

Advertisements

2 Comments

  1. Beautiful site.

    You are right about the extensive development of Baguio. It should be moderated. My mom adores Baguio and would praise it extensively but my first visit last 2004 left me disappointed. Except for the cold midnight weather, this was not the Baguio my mother described. 6 years later it only became more crowded and, with the exception of the old women in costumes outside the Botanical Garden, it resembled just like another town in the lowland.

    Also, a little correction, Baguio is between 1,400 to 1,610 masl not 4,500. Himalayas na yan. Cheers! 🙂

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s